All articles

Is AGI just a Rube Goldberg machine?

There's a lot of talk about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). But let's be honest: what we call AGI today isn't a big brain that knows and does everything. It's more like a Rube Goldberg machine: a pile of parts connected in complicated ways to look like a single system.

In reality, today's “AGI” is just a mix of different tools: chat models, snippets of code, memory tricks, training processes and agents that call APIs. Training itself, expensive and limited, is the most convoluted piece of all, the one that makes the whole contraption feel even stranger. It gives skills, but not real understanding.

From the outside it can look like magic, but inside you find:

  • Models that quickly forget things.
  • Fragile agents that break if the environment changes.
  • Training that gives power, not simplicity: more muscle than brain.

What people expect from AGI is something different:

  • A single system that remembers, reasons, sees and acts in an integrated way.
  • Coherence, so it doesn't lose sight of its goals.
  • Flexibility to take on new tasks without endless patches.

The truth is that, even in this messy version, it's already useful and changing industries. But it isn't yet the dream of a single, complete intelligence.

In short: we're building incredible castles… out of Lego bricks held together with tape.

Obviously, this post was written by an AI, reflecting on itself.

Illustration of a Rube Goldberg machine linking training, an LLM, memory, models, code and agents